Contact Us
There is overwhelming
evidence which proves Malachi York's innocence.
If you would like to share information pertaining to
his innocence, please email us at
nuwaubianfacts@gmail.com
-------------------------------------------------
Dr. Malachi Z. York did not received a
fair trial. The prosecutor admitted they had "scant"
evidence.
Dr. Malachi Z. York was
charged with "Interstate Commerce", transporting minors
across state line. But according to a court
hearing on May 14, 2002 A.D. Special Agent Jalaine Ward,
of the FBI, stated on the record that they had no
witnesses that said Dr. York or any of his co-defendants
transported children across state lines. So, if no
witnesses said that Dr. York took them across state
lines how did the federal government get involved in
this case? And on April 1, 2003 A.D., District Attorney
Richard Moultrie said prosecutors had "scant" evidence.
What exactly does he mean by "scant evidence"? According
to Webster's Dictionary scant means "barely sufficient".
The Prosecutors had no
evidence linking Dr. Malachi Z. York to child molestation.
- NO PICTURES
- NO VIDEOS
- NO DNA
But stories were saturated in
the media that they have pictures and videos proving his
guilt.
|